Friday, 22 December 2017

Breeding Red-brested Flycatchers in Maridalen - A Real Life Soap Opera

The star! Adult male Red-breasted Flycatcher (dvergfluesnapper)

I have previously mentioned that Red-breasted Flycatchers have bred again in Oslo this year and promised a post on them. It has taken a long time to write the post because there has been so much to write about that I have not known where to start. In addition, the whole affair deserves more than a simple blog post and should (and may well) be documented in a scientific journal (Journal of Ornithology has been mentioned). In addition, the volume of photos and especially video that needed reviewing and editing was WAY too much.

The odd Red-breasted Flycatcher has been noted singing in Sørkedalen (Maridalen’s sister valley to the west) for a number of years and in 2015 we documented successful breedingfor the first time. Last year a pair was seen but then vanished and this year two males sang 100 metres from each other but without any sign of a female being present.

Maridalen though provided the real excitement. Here we had more than just breeding – we had cross species (hybrid) pairing, polygamy, adultery and general chaos. If it had been the story line in a soap opera people would have laughed and called it ridiculous!

Halvard Hauer discovered a singing male 21 May. Already two days later he (the bird not Halvard) had stopped singing although responded to playback and his behaviour suggested that he had a female on eggs nearby. Two days after this on 25 May Ellen Askum discovered a male singing strongly about 300m away. The next day Halvard had males at both sites within an hour of each other and it seemed natural to assume there were two different males especially as the bird at the original site wasn’t singing whereas at the new site the bird was singing strongly. I experienced the same on the 29th and also on the 29th saw briefly what I believed was a female with the male at the second site, but views were too brief to be certain of species (could have been a female Pied).

On June 2nd the male was again at the second site but not singing which suggested breeding. And then on 6th June a male was singing at a third site (site 3) which was 300m from site 1 and 600m from site 2 (see later picture). This was quite amazing – could there be three different male Red-breasted Flycatchers in Maridalen? Halvard had around this time noted from his pictures from the first two sites that the male looked to be the same bird due especially to a black spot in the white eye ring on left eye (a feature which we couldn’t find when reviewing other random pictures of the species) and I noted that this “new” bird also had the same black spot. It was now looking like it was the same bird at three different sites but why was it moving around and showing different behaviour at different sites? Later developments would give us the answer….

On 10 June Halvard found the male at site 1 visiting a nest box. Halvard had checked this box on 27 May (6 days after finding bird and 4 days after the male had stopped actively singing) when it contained 2 eggs that looked like normal Pied Flycatcher eggs (but no bird seen). On 10 June there were 6 eggs and a female Pied Flycatcher!! Over the coming days I spent a lot of time with the birds and the male R-b was clearly paired to the female Pied and was bringing food to her. I saw a male Pied Fly perch at the hole of the box but there was no interaction with the female.

On 14 June I found a female (coloured) Rb Fly at a new site (site 4) 150m from site 2. The behaviour of this bird suggested it was a female and not a 2cy male (which lack the red throat of older males). On the same day the eggs hatched in the nestbox at site 1 and the male was present (no photos).

On the 15th at the new site 4 I saw the male acting agitated and in the evening Halvard saw the male and female together here.

On the 16th Halvard and I decided to get to the bottom of the case and I sat at site 1 and Halvard sat at site 4. The male was initially present at site 1 and was active around the nestbox and bringing food to the female. Halvard hadn’t seen sight nor sound of Rb Fly but after 55 minutes of action at site 1 I could not find the male anymore and then 5 minutes later he was at site 4 with Halvard. I remained at site 1 for 20 minutes without the male being present but Halvard was still seeing him. I then went up to Halvard. The male was hanging around a small area close to a nestbox and acting as though he had a female on eggs close by but he didn’t visit a nest and we didn’t see a female although I saw him interact with another bird and thought I heard Rb Fly calls from another area.

On 18 June Halvard again saw both male and female at site 4 but still without locating a nest.

On 20,21 and 22 June the male was taking food to the young at site 1. On 22 June a male Pied Fly also visited the nest box and was twice chased away by the male Rb Fly.

At site 4 I had no certain sightings of Rb fly (of either sex) on 20 and 21 June but on 22 June I had a number of sightings of the female (and photos) and suspected that she was on eggs and leaving them occasionally to feed but could still not locate nest.

It was Halvard again who made the important observation when on 24 June he found the nest. It was quite incredibly placed on a piece of broken off bark and looked to be very unsafe. But finding the nest was only the half of it – there was also a singing male and it was a 2cy bird lacking a red throat!!

The next day the new young male was bringing food to the female on the nest!!!!!

That was my last sighting as I then left Oslo for summer holidays but Halvard was able to follow the birds at site 1 until 4 young they fledged over 28-30 June and also the young at site 4 until the 3 young fledged on 15 July. The original male continued to feed the young at site 1 and was not seen again at site 4 (last sighting on 18 June) whilst the young male (first sighting 24 June) fed the young at site 4 until fledging.

The fledging date at site 4 was 15 July and Halvard believed the young begun hatching on 1 July which is at the upper end of fledging times given in BWP 11-15 days. Working back from this with a given incubation period of 12-13 days means the 3 eggs were most likely laid between 16-18 June. Which tallies well with my first sighting of the female on 14 June and the presence of the 3cy+ male and is well before the 2cy male turned up.

Per Christian Moan also observed the birds and had sighting close to site 3 on 1 July of a 3cy+ male (presumably the original male) with a female (coloured) Rb Fly and giving alarm calls. We will never know who these birds were but hint at the possibility that the original male may well have had a third female (of his own species) at site 3.

The young that fledged from site 1 looked to be pure Pied Flycatchers and had no plumage characters suggesting that their genetic farther was the male Rb Fly. We also have a feather from one of the young plus 2 unhatched eggs from which we are (still…) waiting for DNA results from Oslo University where we involved Glenn-Peter Sætre who has spent years researching Pied Flycatchers.

The theory here is that the male Rb Fly had indeed formed a cross species pair with a female Pied (not sure if this can be called a hybrid pair as it is the young that are hybrids) but that she had already mated with a male of her own species (presumably the bird seen on a couple of occasions at the nestbox). This Pied Flycatcher male was most likely a polygamous male and the female was his second pairing (other Pied Flycatcher broods in the area were more advanced than this brood). He was therefore giving nearly his entire attention to his first female and this gave the opportunity for the male Rb Fly to pair with the female Pied Fly who presumably was happy to have a male bringing her food. We can find no reports of a hybrid pairing between Rb Fly and Pied Fly so this would appear to be a world first!

The other interesting behaviour we observed was polygamy in Rb Flycatcher as the older male had two females (of two different species). Polygamy was not reported in BWP but there is a subsequent paper from Poland which records this. Our sighting though would appear to be only the second documented observation.

What I find most amazing chapter to this story though is that the older male Rb Fly never actually raised his own young. He used all his energy bringing food to the Pied Flycatcher young and although he sired his own young with a female Rb Fly (although this is not proven by DNA) he then gave up paternity of these to a young Rb Fly male who paired with the female (but after the eggs were laid) and then raised the young. So, there were two Rb Fly males who raised another males young.


It will be very interesting to see what happens next year when hopefully a number of these birds will return. There were three breeding Rb Flys, 3 young Rb Flys, 4 young Pied Flys who think their dad is an Rb Fly and have heard his song plus a female Pied Fly who clearly likes the sight and sound of male Rb Flys. So series 2 looks like it could be even more scandalous!


comparison headshots of the male from different sites on different dates. Note the black spot in the lower left of the white eyering




The following two videos tell the story of both nests. The good quality video is taken by Halvard Hauer (HH) using his Nikon P900 and a tripod whereas the rest is my usual hand held quality from my Canon SX60.

Video of the mixed pair:

Video of the breeding female Rb Fly and her two males:

Tuesday, 19 December 2017

Trailer

Here is a trailer for a soon to be released Soap Opera of the crazy family life of some flycatchers in Maridalen

Monday, 18 December 2017

Déjà vu

I’m sticking to my routine and hence my blog post and pictures will give a sense of déjà vu. The Firecrest was not reported (nor indeed any Goldcrests) from Fornebu over the weekend despite a number of people looking so I didn’t need to work too much on my motivation to work on refinding it today. It is of course satisfying to find a skulky bird that evades others, but it is also a good way of keeping the birding senses sharpened – after all, if you can’t find a bird that you know to be there then what are the chances of finding anything else?

It wasn’t easy to find but I used the same tactic as on Friday. Follow up on any high-pitched call as there are not many birds in the area. Once the two Goldcrests and two Treecreepers that were in the area were localised then any other high-pitched call was likely to the bird. I wasted some time on a couple of calls that ended up being Blue Tits but eventually found the hot one. Yet again he was feeding low down and often dropping into the snow and was far from photogenic, but it was easy to follow his movements and food doesn’t seem to be an issue plus the forecast very cold snap never materialised (it only went down to -10C) so his chances of making it into 2018 look good.

A pair of Bearded Tits showed relatively well, and I caught a glimpse of one Water Rail and heard three others but otherwise there was little life.

a crest

male Firecrest

he really was difficult to photograph today

The Bearded Tits (skjeggmeis) were however a bit more cooperative

I'm not quite sure what they have found here but the male spent a long time feeding at the base of the snow


Friday, 15 December 2017

Crests

I have, as expected, visited Fornebu both yesterday and today. Yesterday I failed to find the Firecrest (and it was not reported by any of the other people looking) but today I found it after much perseverance (and after others had given up).  Snow fell on Wednesday night and this has caused the bird to change its behaviour once again to feeding very low down in the bushes or on the ground. It seems strange that it finds more food on the snow that higher up in the pines (where it fed in the sun on Tuesday and Wednesday) but that would definitely seem to be the case. It was once again feeding on its own although there were a couple of Goldcrests, Treecreeper and Blue Tit in the area. One of the Goldcrests fed at eye level less than 3 metres away and gave me my closest ever views of the species – if only the Firecrest had been that cooperative!

Water Rails and Bearded Tits were still present and I managed some pictures of Beardies for the first time in a couple of weeks. They were feeding on the ground at the edge of the reedbed and at times they would disappear in holes under the snow and fallen reeds.


Despite being quite cloe all the branches made photos of the Firecrest (rødtoppfuglekonge) very difficult and meant I had to use manual focus. In these conditions a bird in habitat photo is always a good option ;-)


here it dropped into the snow to grab some food (that had possibly fallen off the bush)

a montage of a feeding Goldcrest (fuglekonge) 



a comparison of the two crest

another habitat shot. Can you spot the male Bearded Tit (skjeggmeis)?

Two female Beardies

this is what most of my photos looked like  
a slighly more cooperative female


and the best shot I managed of a male

Treecreeper (trekryper) - look at those toes and claws - no wonder it can hang upside down on branches



Wednesday, 13 December 2017

Treecreeper and Firecrest

Yesterday offered blue skies and sun and I hoped a chance to enjoy the Firecrest in good light. I was clearly not alone in that thought and when I arrived the bird had already been seen which at least meant that I didn’t need to spend too much time searching for it. The bird eventually showed very well and was feeding high up in some small pine trees and calling frequently which was very different behaviour to my previous observations. I believe that this difference in behaviour was driven by the sunlight which was making small insects easier to find in the pines. It was in constant movement and could be frequently seen grabbing microscopic food items. It moved around quite a lot and at one stage was together with a Goldcrest. These two birds were chasing each other around although I couldn’t work out who was the chaser and who was the chase.

The bird made a variety of calls today but only on a couple of occasions did I hear the characteristic call which attracted me to the bird when I found it last week. Otherwise it was making calls very similar to Goldcrest and also Treecreeper. Indeed, it was in the same vicinity as a Treecreeper for a while and I found it difficult to separating the quite contact calls of both birds.






Firecrest (rødtoppfuglekonge) in sunlight although it was cold (-5C)



with a tiny food item - maybe an incest egg




an unusually trusting Treecreeper (trekryper)




Monday, 11 December 2017

I'm on Fire

As usual my weekend was not spent birding but it looks like a number of people were out at Fornebu looking the Firecrest but there were no reports of it after Thursday afternoon. This was just the sort of motivation I needed to visit Fornebu today J It took quite a bit of work but eventually I found him about 400m away from where he was on Wednesday and Thursday. He was all alone and feeding mostly on the floor. There were a couple of Goldcrests not too far away and these were feeding 3-4 metres up in bushes and calling quite a lot whereas their cousin made very little noise. He was quite confiding but there were far too many twigs in the way to get any decent pictures and I had to use manual focus all the time.

Bearded Tits were calling in two of the reedbeds and there were four calling Water Rails in total one of which showed itself on two occasions. A calling Chiffchaff from a reedbed was quite a surprise but if a Firecrest can survive then a Chiffchaff should also manage to.

Back at home there was a mini influx of House Sparrows into the garden after they had been mostly absent for a few weeks. One bird caught my attention and after a bit of study I have concluded that it is a female hybrid between House and Tree Sparrow. I have seen a fair few pictures of this hybrid combo before, but these are always of assumed males whereas this bird was clearly a female due to a yellow bill base and pale supercilium (features of female House Sparrow) and a quick google search has yet to reveal any other photos of females. It was quite a subtle bird which mostly resembled a female House Sparrow but had a prominent white collar, a black smudge on a white chin, a small grey bib and a crown that was a mixture of grey and brown.

spot the bird

was again feeding on the ground

I did manage one OK picture - Firecrest (rødtoppfuglekonge)

a male Green Woodpecker (grønnspett) that has been at Fornebu for a while now

when I first saw this bird I thought it was a strange female House Sparrow (gråspurv) with a prominent neck collar

but the grey bib and dark cheek smudge plus reddy brown colours in the crown reveal the Tree Sparrow (pilfink) genes 

female hybird House Sparrow x Tree Sparrow


Thursday, 7 December 2017

Firecrest video

The firecrest was still present today and had a number of admirers but was much more difficult to observe than when I found it yesterday and it hardly made any noise. There were also two Goldcrests in the area which made things a bit more complicated. It was feeding exclusively on the ground during the 25 minutes that I saw the bird but then vanished for a couple of hours before being found again later. For an insect eating bird of more southerly climes it must be a challenge to stay alive!

Wednesday, 6 December 2017

Now we are talking!

I decided to shake things up a but today and be a bit rebellious – I visited Fornebu first and Maridalen afterwards!! I know, I know, I live life on the edge ;-)

Overnight wet snow had left the reedbeds partially flattened but this did nothing to make the Bearded Tits more visible although I was eventually able to ascertain that there were still at least two in Holtekilen and four in Storøykilen. I then decided to go out to Koksa which I haven’t done so much recently as there has been so little there. As I walked out I reminisced over the rare birds that I have seen at Fornebu over the years with two Isabelline Shrikes, a Siberian Stonechat, a Med Gull and Sabine’s Gull heading my list. I mulled over the fact that the chances of finding anything rare was getting less and less with the continued development of the site and it may be that Bearded Tits become the rarest species that the site hosts with any regularity.

When I arrived at Koksa a complete lack of life was confirmation of what my previous visits have told me. As I walked along hoping that maybe a Water Rail would call I heard a high-pitched call from the small copse by the path. There is often Treecreeper here but the call didn’t quite match and I had a feeling that it was something much rarer. I pulled out my phone and checked the call of Firecrest and got an instant match! This species has recently turned up in record numbers in Sweden, 7 have been seen in one area of Rogaland in west Norway and it looks like the UK has had very high numbers. I have had it on my mind for the last month and have always checked out Goldcrests when  I have encountered them away from the deep forests but was not planning on finding one today! But was it really one? It continued calling and I walked towards it without seeing anything and started to check the tree trunks for Treecreeper when I finally saw a small bird in a bush. Bins up and bang – Akershus County’s first Firecrest was a fact (following Oslo’s first record in May). This species was removed from the national rarity list this year due to a significant increase in records but they have been centred on the southern and south west coast.

I took a while to get any decent shots of the bird and melting snow from the branches above me kept falling on me and my optics, but I was happy with what I managed given the light and conditions. I didn’t get to spend much time with it as a message from my eldest meant I had to go and help her with something, but I got the news out and it was seen again later in the day.

Maridalen did get a visit later in the afternoon where a flock of 140 Yellowhammers is the largest flock recorded in Maridalen. I did not get to see them well but there must be a chance of finding a Pine Bunting amongst them…


It is fair to say that my case of birder blues has been (at least temporarily) banished!





the first picture I fired off - just what a record shot should look like!






Akershus's first Firecrest (rødtoppfuglekonge)




the thin orane stripe within the yellow crown shows this to be a male and I believe a 1cy bird as an older bird should have an even more orange crown

food was clearly not east to come by for an insect eater in the snow but I was surprised to see it on the ground
the reedbed at Storøykilen where the reeds were weighed down by the wet snow but 4 Bearded Tits still found conditions suitable for them
map from Artsobservasjoner.no showing all the records of Firecrest in Norway clearly showing the bias towards coastal sites in the south and south west